This guide is written for hobbyists, prototype builders or engineers looking for some basic information and intuition like:
- “How large of a screw/bolt do I need?”
- “What types of screws are out there and what are the for?”
- “What are washers for, and do lock-washers work?”
- “How tight should a screw be, and how does that affect how much load it can handle?”
- “Coarse vs. Fine thread?”
* If it really matters (risk to property or bodily harm), hire a professional engineer; there could be errors in this guide.
Contents
- Common types of wood, machine and drywall screws and their uses
- Common machines screws, head types and uses
- Thread types: UNC, UNRF, M,… what’s available and when should it be used?
- Sizing: how big a screw is needed for a given load? How does tightness affect this?
- Installation: How much torque and why?
- Screw Grades: What’s the difference between grades and when should I use them?
- Washers and Locknuts: When to use which kind
- Material Selection: steel, stainless, zinc plated, galvanized…
- Additional Resources and References
Terminology and basic identification
What’s the difference between a bolt and a screw? Most sources (like the Machinery’s Handbook) define screws and bolts in terms of how they are installed: if you turn the head it’s a screw, if you turn a nut it’s a bolt. A hex head cap screw and hex bolt may look identical. This guide refers to both interchangably.
Wood, Sheet Metal and Drywall Screws – differences, uses, and head types
- Wood Screws: These have a coarser pitch (few threads per inch) than sheet metal or machine screws, and often have an unthreaded shank. The threadless shank allows the top piece of wood to be pulled flush against the under piece without getting caught on the threads. Some wood screws are tapered from tip to head, also. This site lists pre-drill sizes for various sized screws.
- Sheet Metal Screws: Usually threaded all the way to their head, these will work in wood, but wood screws shouldn’t be used in metal (this is based on hardware store employee advice, not experimental evidence). Most of these screws are self-tapping in that they only require a pre-drilled hole (pre-drill sizes), but some come with self-drilling (shown in above pic) or self-tapping tips. Here’s a large list of different types of tips, the more common ones appear to be A, AB (pointed) and B (no point). Here’s a good guide to the different point types and uses. See more pics of thread cutting screws here. Even more good pictures of different head types.
- Drywall Screws: The coarse thread version is meant to secure drywall to wood while the fine thread version is for attachment to metal studs (commonly used in office construction). The head-to-shaft junction is more curved than in a wood screw to prevent tearing of the dry-wall. These can also come with self-drilling tips.
Common Head Types for the Above Screws (and 3 machine screws)
- Slotted, Phillips and Square drives: The main drawback of slotted heads is that power driven screw drivers easily cam out. Phillips heads address this problem to a certain extent, but these were actually designed to cause the bit to cam out at a certain point to prevent over-tightening. There have been revisions of the original Phillips head, most notably the patented Pozidriv, which does not have rounded internal corners and won’t cause the driving bit to pop out. The square or Robertson drive is least likely to cam out and transfers the greatest amount of torque. The wiki Screw page and this one describe some other less commong drives.
- Round vs. Pan head: A pan head is successor to the round head, and is slightly flatter with greater thickness near its circumference than the round head. This supplies more surface area for the driving bit to grip over the round head, especially for slotted or flat drivers.
- Carriage Bolts: These have a square shank that sinks into and grips wood when a nut is tightened.
- Flat and Oval Head: The most common type of head for wood, these heads end up flush or below the surface of the wood when installed. An oval head is similar, except that it has a decorative rounded top that remains above the surface.
- Security Heads (tamper proof): These screws have heads that are either impossible to reverse or require a special driver to operate. Some other types include the spanner (two small holes), tri-wing (used on the Wii), and torx or square drives with pins protruding up in the center of the socket. Some even have sacrificial heads that can be broken off after installing the screw. Here and here are several pictures of these screws.
- Hex Washer Head and Truss head: These screws have a built in washer to help distribute load to a wider area. A truss head (not shown) is a flatter and wider than a typical round or pan head and serves the same purpose. These are commonly found on license plates.
This fastener guide gives a great pictorial overview of just about every fastener type, and here is a good overview of possible head types..
This talks about different screw types and their uses, also a bit about washers and rivets.
Machine Screws
Machine screws are generally stronger than wood screws, have finer threads and are made more precisely. They’re used with nuts or tapped holes. Several examples are shown below. 
- Socket Screws: While many hex cap screws may be found in vehicles, socket head screws are becoming more popular and have some space saving advantages over hex cap screws. Socket heads take up less space themselves and don’t require side room for wrenches. They also are usually made from stronger alloy steel vs. hex cap screws, but this depends on the grade and manufacturer.
- Allen / Hex Socket vs Torx: Most socket head screws accept a hex or Allen wrench (6 sided), but Torx heads (loosely, a 6 pointed star) are also available. Torx sockets were originaly designed to prevent the driver from camming out, and can transfer more torque than a Phillips or slotted driver. They don’t require large amounts of pressure to keep the bit in the socket. Some people say that it’s faster to insert a bit into a Torx screw than a hex socket, which would be advantageous in manufacturing environments.
- Button Head: This head is largely decorative and somewhat similar to a round head, but flatter.
- Flat head (counter sunk): These require a pre-drilled counter sink, and are typically angled at 82 degrees (Unified thread), which, by the way, is not the angle created by most drill bits (118 degrees). Metric flat heads have 90 degree angles.
- Shoulder Screws: These have precision ground shanks that remain above the head of a hole and provide a simple way to make an axel for a wheel. They are also used when something must be secured, but not clamped.
- Set Screws: These are threaded along their entire length and are typically used to secure a shaft from rotating. They’re used in pulleys, sprockets, collars and knobs among other things.
Here’s a great doc from tessco that talks about different screw types and their applications, grade and strength information, and screw material guidance.
Thread Types: Most common types and when to use which
The most common thread types are the inch-based Unified coarse / fine (UNC/UNF) and metric coarse / fine. Other types and their purposes are described at the end of this section.
Coarse or Fine? To oversimplify, use a coarse thread unless you’re tapping into sheet metal. The differences are:
- Coarse theads have fewer threads per inch than fine threads.
- Coarse threads are more common, and more shops will have coarse taps.
- Coarse threads are less likely to cross-thread, or jam because the screw is inserted at an angle. They’re also faster to install.
- Screws with fine threads are slightly stronger. This is because the smaller fine threads take up less of the available area. See the loading charts below to see typical differences between the tensile strength of a fine vs coarse thread. A 1/4 UNF thread is about 14% stronger than its UNC counterpart.
- Coarse threads are slightly stronger (against stripping) per length of engagement than finer threads (see thread strength section below). This may be surprising given the almost universal recommendation that fine threads be used in sheet metal and other thin-walled materials. If coarse threads are stronger and there is less than optimal thread engagement length available, wouldn’t it better to use the stronger threads?
- Coarse threads are more tolerant to slight damage or corrosion than fine threads since they have more room for error.
- Fine threads provide finer adjustment since they advance less per rotation than coarse threads.
- The metric coarse thread is actually between UN coarse and fine thread, and the metric fine thread is finer than the UNF threads. Blake’s “What Every Engineer Should Know About Threaded Fasteners: Materials and Design,” recommends not using fine metric threads.
Thread specification – How threads are notated / designated:
example Unified thread designation:
1/4-20 UNC-2A
- 1/4 – the nominal diameter, also the major / largest diameter
- -20 – the number of threads per inch
- UNC – UNC = Unified Coarse, UNF = Unified Fine. You may also see UNRC or UNRF. These refer to an external Unified Rounded thread (there is no internal rounded thread). UNRC’s and UNRF’s are interchangeable with their non-R counterparts. The only difference is that the vallies (roots) of external R threads have a mandatory rounded shape, whereas with the UNC and UNF threads the roundness is optional.
- -2A – This represents the tolerance / fit of the thread. There are 6 common options, 1A, 2A, 3A, 1B, 2B, and 3B. A=external, B=internal. 1 is the loosest fit, 3 is the most precise and tightest fit with potentially zero clearance. If the tolerance isn’t specified, chances are it’s the more common 2A or 2B designation. 1 is hardly used, and only in cases where frequent re-assembly is needed or the threads need to work even with significant damage. Class 3 have slightly greater stripping resistance, and are common in the aerospace industry.
example ISO Metric thread designation:
M6 x 1 -4g6g or M6-6g
- M6– M is for metric, 6 is the major diameter and nominal size in mm
- x 1 – Pitch. Note that this is different from how Unified threads are specified. UN threads write the number of threads per inch after the nomimal size, whereas metric designations write 1 / threads_per_inch after the nominal size. If this is absent, coarse pitch is assumed.
- -4g6g – This is the tolerance / fit class. The number refers to a manufacturing tolerance window, higher numbers are “sloppier.” The letter places that tolerance window relative to the ideal thread. Capital letters refer to internal threads, lowercase external. An h/H has the least amount of allowance–ie, there could be no clearance. g/G and lower represent more allowance. The two numberLetter pairs apply to pitch grade/tolerance and major diameter grade/tolerance for external threads, pitch and minor diameter for internal threads. When only one pair is present (as in M6-6g) it applies to both pitch and major/minor dia. 6g/6H is approximately equivalent to 2A/2B, 4h6h/4H5H is approximately equivalent to 3A/3B, although 4g6g/6H is usually used, which provides a little clearance over 3A/3B.
* a -LH at the end of either inch or metric threads indicates Left Handed threading.
* a (22) or other number at the end refers to the ANSI series of threads.
Some history and info about other threads:
In 1949, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the US agreed to a Unified thread that is largely the same as the American National thread that came before it, and screws from both systems are interchangeable. The new Unified system bascially added more manufacturing tolerances and tweaked some other ones. See ANSI/ASME B1.1 -1989 (R2001) for details.
Metric threads are specified in ANSI B1.13M-1982 (R1995), which is very nearly equivalent to the original ISO 68 specification.
Camera mount threads: These are generally a coarser old standard called the “Whitworth” 1/4 inch diameter and 20 threads per inch.
UNJ or MJ: These threads are used in situations where fasteners must withstand high fatigue stress, predominantely the aerospace industry. The basic difference between UNJ and UN is a larger root radius. Avoidance of sharp corners is critical for fatigue resistance. The root is given a large enough radius that it could potentially interfere with a typical UN internal thread, so there are both external and internal UNJ threads (and MJ’s). According to Blake, it is statistically highly likely that an external UNJ thread will fit a regular internal UN thread.
Standards: In general, the geometry is definied by ANSI, ASME and the ISO, while material strength properties are defined by ASTM, IFI, SAE and ISO.
Cut vs. Rolled Threads: This refers to how threads are manufactured. Rolled threads are stronger than cut/ground threads because they are strain hardened when they are made, and the internal grains of the metal are not cut. The Unified standard doesn’t demand that the roots (vallies) of external threads be rounded, but just about all fasteners less than 1″ come that way because their threads are rolled (see Blake book ref. above), and rolling produces rounded roots.
Constant pitch series: This refers to the many series of threads where the pitch does not increase with diameter. The 8-UN (8 threads / inch) series is apparently very popular above 1″ diameter fasteners. Typically these are used for adjustment devices and not fasteners.
Extra fine threads and minature screws: The Machinery’s Handbook has listings of dimensions for really small screws.
Power Screws and ACME Threads: Power screws’ job is to translate rotational motion into linear motion. Because of this, efficiency is a concern, and the 60 degree thread profile in standard fasteners is unsuited. The most efficient thread would be square with 90 degree angles, but this is difficult to manufacture, so the ACME thread is used (this has a 15.5 degree angle between root floor and tooth wall). Why is square more efficient? None of its force goes into pushing outward, whereas a 60 degree thread has a substantial force component away from the axial direction of the screw.
Sizing and Strength: How big a screw is needed?
At first thought, sizing a screw for a given load would seem to be a simple matter. If you need to hold 100 lbs, find a screw that can hold 100 lbs before it yields…
But things are not so simple. If a screw can withstand 100 lbs of force before yielding, it is recommended for a number of reasons (discussed in the next section) that it be tightened to about 80 lbs of tension / clamping force just for installation alone. Does that mean that it can only withstand another 20 lbs of external load before it yields? Why would we tighten a screw so much if we’re using up the majority of its strength just to hold it in place? It turns out that only a portion of the external load is seen by the bolt, a rough estimate is about 1/3, but this depends on lots of things.
It seems reasonable to think that the tension on a screw / bolt is the sum of the initial clamping load plus any external loads, but this is not so. Consider the following picture and imagine that the screw (or spring) is clamping the red box against the ground with 10 lbs of force. Now, if you were to pull up on the red box with 5 lbs of force, would the tension in the screw increase to 15 lbs? No, your 5 lbs of upwards force would only reduce the pressure between the red box and the ground; it would not stretch the screw at all. In fact, the screw would not feel any change in force whatsoever until the upward force exceeded 10 lbs and the reb box lifts. The force / tension in a spring depends only on its stretch (F=kx), and if the bolt head isn’t moving, the tension isn’t changing.
In most situations, however, the ground would act as a spring, too (in compression). As an external load is applied, the ground would de-compress as the clamping force lowered, so the bolt head would indeed move slightly. In the end, a screw / bolt feels some fraction of an external load, and the amount it feels depends on how the spring rate of of the bolt compares to the spring rate of the joint (ground in picture). If you know the spring rates of the bolt and joint, the following equations will tell you how much force each feels for a given pre-load and external load. Here’s
another good explanation of this. 
Of course, calculating the joint spring rate is a dubious matter and we encourage you to read Unbrako’s engineering guide if you’re designing anything that remotely matters.
For hobbyists designing things that aren’t mission critical, it’s probably not unreasonable to assume that about 1/3 of the external load is felt by the bolt, but in stiff joints with very flat surfaces (bumpy surfaces add to joint-spongyness), less than 1/7 of the load could be placed on the bolt (ref 1, p. 431). Of course, on rubber gaskets, 100% would be felt by the bolt. Another rule of thumb is to make sure the pre-load is at least twice any external loads to reduce the risk that clamping force will be lost–when this happens bolt loosening is highly likely.
Here’s a rough guide for picking a screw or bolt for a given load:
Start off with the load that needs to be held in tension, call this F. If you have a shear (sideways) load, you should design so that friction or dowell pins will bear the load and not the bolt, but if this isn’t an option note that shear strength is 60% of tensile strength in many steels.
We’ll use a safety factor of 2.5, so the design load is now 2.5F. Now we need to select a screw with enough strength so that it can withstand the combined external load and pre-load from tightening. Assuming that 80% of the bolt’s proof strength is being used up in preload, that leaves 20% to handle 1/3 of the external load. Or in other words, we’re looking for a bolt where 60% of its proof strength is greater than the load.
Let’s try an example: What size grade 2 bolt is necessary to hold 100 lbs? The proof strength of Grade 2 bolts between .24 and .75 inches is 55 ksi (thousand pounds per square inch), and 60% of this is 34.2 ksi. So, we’re looking for a bolt with a tensile area greater than our load (2.5*100 lbs) divided by 33 ksi, or .0076 square inches. A #6 UNC should work. For perspective the diameter of a #6 screw is .138″, (1/8 = .125″). If this seems small, keep in mind that the ultimate strength (breaking strength) of a Grade 2 bolt is 74 ksi, so a #6 screw could theoretically hold 672 lbs in pure tension. If you’re wondering why bolts you see in cars and weight machines are so large, it’s partly to guard against loosening and fatigue failure in addition to safety factors.
What about changing loads? According to this Unbrako whitepaper on the Fastener Act, over 85% of failures are due to fatigue and not a simple overloading situation. Think about breaking a paper clip, which is easier: bending it back and forth or out-right pulling it apart? If you have an oscillating load and want a joint to last forever, the best advice we can offer is to multiply the anticipated load by 10 or more, and even this may not be sufficient. Steel can handle about half of its ultimate strength in an alternating load, but add in the pre-load stress and something called a “Stress Concentration Factor” due to the threads and the problem gets more complicated quickly. Here’s a good explanation of these effects along with a lot of other great screw information.
Installation: How tight should a screw be? (very)
In the tables below, we use 80% of proof strength as an estimate for the amount of stress on a correctly tightened bolt just due to its installed clamping force, without any external loads. The Machinery’s handbook recommends 50-80% of ultimate tensile strength, or 75-90% of yield or proof strength (75% for reusable joints, 90% for permanent). Some screws are even tightened to yield. It would seem that this level of installation tightness leaves very little strength left over to handle external loads… why do this?
- The tighter the screw, the more friction there is to resist loosening.
- Screws are very likely to come loose if any relative motion occurs between the threads. Static friction is substantially higher than sliding friction, so once movement in one direction starts, it becomes much easier for un-screwing motion to happen, also. A high clamping force creates more friction between the clamped surfaces and therefore reduces the chances they will slide relative to each other.
- As a followup, bolts are less strong against shear (sideways) loads, so more clamping force and friction helps reduce these loads, also.
- Fatigue loading:This is possibly the most common reason sited for extremely high initial tightness. As derived above, as long as the external load doesn’t cause separation in the joint, only a portion of it is actually seen by the bolt. This is especially helpful in cases with alternating loads because the lifespan depends heavily on the magnitude of the changing load, not just its average. In many cases it’s better to have a higher average stress and lower alternating load, and this is the tradeoff that a high pre-load supplies.One subtle point is that the percentage of the load seen by the bolt only depends on the relative stiffness of the joint and bolt, not on the amount of preload. As long as joint separation does not occur, additional tightening preload does not buy any additional fatigue protection. Large intial preloads still pretect against joint separation, but unless you know otherwise, it’s probably not worthwhile to tighten right up near yield.
- A tighter initial clamping force can actually increases the joint stiffness slightly by flattening somewhat uneven joint surfaces. If only a small pre-load is applied, the joint members might be resting on hills on their surfaces which could get worn down or compressed over time.
How to achieve the required tightness
According to the Machinery’s handbook, tightening by feel is only +-35% accurate, and using a torque wrench only improves the accuracy to about +-25%. These uncertainties are massive, and give good reason not to tighten too close to yield, or too loose, and also to design a joint so that it will still work with a huge span of possible pre-loads. A method called “turn-of-nut” can supposedly get within +-10%, but this relies heavily on a reliable starting point from which to start counting turns (see Machinery’s handbook).
If the application is critical (and you are not relying on this guide), ultrasonic sensing of the bolt length or drilling a hole down the middle and attaching strain gages will achieve much higher accuracy. Friends in the navy have told us that workers will sometimes heat a very large bolt during installation to utilize its cooling stretch in achieving proper preload.
To add two more variables, additional torsional loads are present during installation, although these usually dissipate shortly afterwords. It can also be assumed that, due to a variety of factors (surface smoothness, uneven loads, thread deformation), some 10% of preload will be lost.
Why is a torque wrench so imprecise? Friction. Some 80+% of applied torque goes into defeating friction, leaving little for actually stretching the bolt. What’s worse is that this friction is highly unpredictable and depends heavily on the materials involved and any lubrication that may be present. Most fasteners have a small amount of oil present from the manufacturer to prevent rust.
From the machinery’s handbook, the following equation can be used to approximate the required torque for a given preload:
Torque = K x preload x nominal_diameter
where K is a friction constant that depends on material and lubrication
| material | K |
|---|---|
| mild-steel, 1/4 – 1 inch dia. | .2 |
| nonplated black finish | .3 |
| zinc-plated | .2 |
| lubricated | .18 |
| cadmium-plated | .16 |
Just to get a flavor, using K=.2 and 80% of 120 ksi proof strength for a SAE Grade 8 1/4 bolt, the above formula gives a seating torque of about 150 in-lbs, or about 13 lbs at the end of a foot long wrench.
Another method recommended by the Machinery’s Handbook is to measure the torque necessary to break a test bolt, and then use 50-60% of this value. This will supposedly be 60-70% of yield.
Pencom offers a chart with recommended torques for various grades and sizes of screws. Another chart from the Elgin fastener Group. Joseph has a great page about bolt tension and even did his own experiment to verify the variability of tightening by hand.
Grade and Strength Information
There are numerous standards that fasteners are manufactured to, and those standards describe everything from material chemistry to surface finish to heat treatment. The most relevant numbers are “Proof Stress,” “Yield Stress” and “Tensile / Ultimate Stress.” Tensile Strength is how much stress the material can withstand before finally ripping apart. Yield Stress is the amount of stress that a material can undergo before permanently stretching. Proof stress is similar to Yield stress except that it is slightly less (about 90%), and only applies to fasteners. The thread geometry causes them to yield slightly before the Yield stress level of the material, so Proof Stress can be thought of the true yield–in other words, the fastener will behave like a spring below that stress level.
So which of these numbers should be used? While there are many arguments for tightening a screw past its yield point (for instance), from this author’s viewpoint, if an external load yields a screw, and if that load is ever removed, the screw will now be permanently stretched and loose. Therefore, we recommend designing so that the combined internal and external loads stay below the proof stress to avoid any possibility of yielding. If proof stress is unknown, 85% of Yield stress can be used as an approximation. The ultimate or tensile stress is sometimes designed to, but we do not know when this acceptable or not. Also, the ultimate stress is used in designing joints for alternating loads, but this is beyond our scope.
Several organizations publish standards for fasteners. For inch/english, this includes SAE, ASTM, ANSI, ASME and others, although the most commonly used are the SAE “Grades.”(standard J429). The most common metric specifications are published by the ISO. (ANSI metric specs agree with ISO for all practical purposes–Machinery’s Handbook)
Common Inch / Imperial SAE Grades: (all values in ksi or 1000 lbs / square inch)
| Head Marking |
Grade | Diameter (in) | Proof Strength | Yield Strength | Tensile (Ultimate) Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
2 | 1/4 to 3/4 | 55 | 57 | 74 |
| 3/4 to 1-1/2 | 33 | 36 | 60 | ||
 |
5 | 1/4 to 1 | 85 | 92 | 120 |
| 1 to 1-1/2 | 74 | 81 | 105 | ||
 |
8 | 1/4 to 1-1/2 | 120 | 130 | 150 |
Socket Head Cap Screws made from alloy steel are typically manufactured to a higher strength than SAE Grade 8: 180 ksi tensile strength for fasteners up to 1/2 inch, 170 ksi for larger sizes (ASTM A574, p. G-34).
For many more head markings and their corresponding specifications, see here.
Metric ISO Marking
Metric fasteners are marked with two numbers separated by a decimal point, like 10.9. The 10 is 1/100 of tensile strength in MPa, and the .9 represents the ratio of yield to tensile strength. So 10.9 represents a tensile strength of 1000 MPa and yield of 900 MPa. Some strengths are stronger than this method shows, see table 10 on this page. Other references for this table: here and here.
| Grade | size range | proof strength (MPa) |
approx yield strength (MPa) grade dec x tensile* |
tensile strength (MPa) |
approx equiv. to SAE grade: |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | M1.6-M16 | 310 | 336 | 420 | SAE 2 |
| 8.8 | < M16 | 580 | 640 | 800 | SAE 5 |
| M16-M76 | 600 | 660 | 830 | ||
| 10.9 | > M5 | 830 | 940 | 1040 | SAE 8 |
| 12.9 | M1.6-M100 | 970 | 1100 | 1220 | ASTM-A574 alloy socket screws |
*these value aren’t necessarily from the standards, they’re calculated as described above.
Tensile stress areas and acceptable load estimates for various grades
For applications where there is any chance of bodily or property harm, don’t rely on our external load estimates–they are intended to give a rough approximation of what screws of various grades can hold in non-critical applications, and are based on the following assumptions:
- We use the proof strength as the maximum stress that should be endured from the combined internal (original tightening) and external loads.
- If proof load isn’t specified in the above tables, we use 85% of yield
- It is assumed that the joint is twice as stiff as the bolt, which implies that 1/3 of the external load is seen by the bolt, and the other 2/3 goes into reducing clamping load. The forumla explained above and used below is 60% * proof * tensile area / 1.0 (safety factor). We recommend using a 2.5 safety factor for non-critical / costly applications–ie, divide the numbers below by 2.5. For joints clamping aluminum, plastic, gaskets or other softer material it’s safer to assume that 100% of external load is seen by the fastener (multiply by 20% instead of 60%).
- tensile stress area:Tests have shown that the average of the minor and pitch diameters approximates the effective area of a fastener. The Machinery’s handbook has a different formula for bolts with tensile strengths over 100ksi, but due to some doubt about its origins, we don’t use it.
- As far as we can tell, SAE Grades apply only to bolts at least 1/4″ in diameter. Any unmarked machine screws smaller than that are probably Grade 2; we show the higher Grades for reference only on those sizes. Alloy steel socket head cap screws will most likely have a greater strength than SAE Grade 8 unless their manufacturer says otherwise.
- We assume shear loads and torsional loads from tightening are zero.
- For alloy socket screws, yield strength is 180 ksi until 1/2″ and 170 ksi for larger diameters. We use 85% of these values to approximate proof strength.
Inch tensile areas and loads (in lbs), both fine and coarse thread
| size – threads / in |
dec. major diameter (in) |
tensile stress area square inches |
Grade 2 (proof strength: <=3/4″: 55 ksi >3/4″: 33 ksi) |
Grade 5 (proof strength: 85 ksi) |
Grade 8 (proof strength: 120 ksi) |
alloy socket head (ASTM A574) <=1/2″: 153 ksi >1/2″: 144.5 ksi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #0-80 | .0600 | .00180 | 59.4 | 91.8 | 129.6 | 165.24 |
| #2-56 | .086 | .00370 | 122.1 | 188.7 | 266.4 | 339.66 |
| #2-64 | .086 | .00394 | 130.02 | 200.94 | 283.68 | 361.692 |
| #4-40 | .112 | .00604 | 199.32 | 308.04 | 434.88 | 554.472 |
| #4-48 | .112 | .00661 | 218.13 | 337.11 | 475.92 | 606.798 |
| #6-32 | .138 | .00909 | 299.97 | 463.59 | 654.48 | 834.462 |
| #6-40 | .138 | .01015 | 334.95 | 517.65 | 730.8 | 931.77 |
| #8-32 | .164 | .0140 | 462 | 714 | 1008 | 1285.2 |
| #8-36 | .164 | .01474 | 486.42 | 751.74 | 1061.28 | 1353.132 |
| #10-24 | .190 | .0175 | 577.5 | 892.5 | 1260 | 1606.5 |
| #10-32 | .190 | .0200 | 660 | 1020 | 1440 | 1836 |
| 1/4-20 | .250 | .0318 | 1049.4 | 1621.8 | 2289.6 | 2919.24 |
| 1/4-28 | .250 | .0364 | 1201.2 | 1856.4 | 2620.8 | 3341.52 |
| 5/16-18 | .3125 | .0524 | 1729.2 | 2672.4 | 3772.8 | 4810.32 |
| 5/16-24 | .3125 | .0580 | 1914 | 2958 | 4176 | 5324.4 |
| 3/8-16 | .375 | .0775 | 2557.5 | 3952.5 | 5580 | 7114.5 |
| 3/8-24 | .375 | .0878 | 2897.4 | 4477.8 | 6321.6 | 8060.04 |
| 7/16-14 | .4375 | .1063 | 3507.9 | 5421.3 | 7653.6 | 9758.34 |
| 7/16-20 | .4375 | .1187 | 3917.1 | 6053.7 | 8546.4 | 10896.66 |
| 1/2-13 | .5 | .1419 | 4682.7 | 7236.9 | 10216.8 | 13026.42 |
| 1/2-20 | .5 | .1599 | 5276.7 | 8154.9 | 11512.8 | 14678.82 |
| 9/16-12 | .5625 | .182 | 6006 | 9282 | 13104 | 15779.4 |
| 9/16-18 | .5625 | .203 | 6699 | 10353 | 14616 | 17600.1 |
| 5/8-11 | .625 | .226 | 7458 | 11526 | 16272 | 19594.2 |
| 5/8-18 | .625 | .256 | 8448 | 13056 | 18432 | 22195.2 |
| 3/4-10 | .75 | .334 | 6613.2 | 17034 | 24048 | 28957.8 |
| 3/4-16 | .75 | .373 | 7385.4 | 19023 | 26856 | 32339.1 |
| 7/8-9 | .875 | .462 | 9147.6 | 23562 | 33264 | 40055.4 |
| 7/8-14 | .875 | .509 | 10078.2 | 25959 | 36648 | 44130.3 |
| 1-8 | 1.0 | .606 | 11998.8 | 30906 | 43632 | 52540.2 |
| 1-12 | 1.0 | .663 | 13127.4 | 33813 | 47736 | 57482.1 |
alternative load carrying recommendations: here.
Metric coarse thread tensile stress areas and estimated loads (in N)
Fine pitch information and more can be found here. Formula for tensile stress area: pi/4* (Nominal_Diameter-.938194*pitch)^2
Formula for load: 60% * tensile area * proof stress / (safety_factor = 1.0)
| size x pitch |
tensile stress area square mm |
Grade 4.8 (proof strength: M1.6-M16: 310 MPa) |
Grade 8.8 (proof strength: < M16: 580 MPa >= M16: 600 Mpa) |
Grade 10.9 (proof strength: > M5: 120 MPa) |
Grade 12.9 (proof strength: 970 MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2x.4 | 2.0732 | 386 N | 721 N | n/a | 1207 N |
| 2.5x.45 | 3.3908 | 631 | 1180 | n/a | 1973 |
| 3x.5 | 5.0308 | 936 | 1751 | n/a | 2928 |
| 4x.7 | 8.7787 | 1633 | 3055 | n/a | 5109 |
| 5x.8 | 14.183 | 2638 | 4936 | n/a | 8255 |
| 6×1 | 20.123 | 3743 | 7003 | 10021 N | 11712 |
| 8×1.25 | 36.609 | 6809 | 12740 | 18231 | 21306 |
| 10×1.5 | 57.99 | 10786 | 20181 | 28879 | 33750 |
| 12×1.75 | 84.267 | 15674 | 29325 | 41965 | 49043 |
| 16×2 | 156.67 | 29141 | 56401 | 78022 | 91182 |
| 20×2.5 | 244.79 | n/a | 88124 | 121905 | 142468 |
| 24×3 | 352.5 | n/a | 126900 | 175545 | 205155 |
Nut and tapped hole strength – How much thread engagement is needed?
If a screw / bolt fails because the threads strip, it can be hard to detect both during installation and later because the threads will still have some grip on the screw. If the bolt breaks, however, it will be completely loose, be easy to detect and remove, and usually fail during installation when additional torsional loads are present (torsional loads usually dissipate within minutes after tightening if you’re wondering why we didn’t take them into account before). Because of this, fasteners are designed to fail in the bolt, not the threads, so most nuts are more than adequate–just make sure you use a similar grade of nut compared to the screw.
How much thread engagement is needed in a tapped hole, then? According to “Fundamentals of Machine Component Design”, 3rd addition, by Juvinall and Marshek, p. 413, if the bolt and nut are of similar material the thread stripping stength will equal the bolt tensile strenth when the nut is .47 * diameter. Standard nuts are 7/8 of a diameter, for comparison.
Interestingly, more than a third of the load is held by the first thread in a nut according to this. As the bolt tightens, its threads stretch and the nut’s threads compress, which reduces force on the far threads.
The .47*dia calculation above takes this imbalance into account, but it will certainly be different for other material combinations. This offers some formula (also found in machinery’s handbook) for calculating the shear area of threads, but it’s uncertain how one would apply that formula given the imbalanced thread load. The Machinery’s handbook suggests at least 3 threads of engagement. We recommend 1 diameter depth for steel and 1.5-2 diameters for aluminum. The referenced formulas may at least provide a rough estimate for sheet metal, where thread engagement is limited. Unbrako’s Engineering guide has several charts showing experimental testing of various sized holes. According to their guide, formulas have performed poorly at predicting thread strength.
Washers – what are they for? Do lock washers really lock? Do lock nuts? + other locking methods
Washers help distribute load and prevent the screw head from digging into the joint material. If the surface of the joint isn’t smooth, it’s more likely that the screw will compress higher spots over time and come loose. Also, if the surface is damaged by the screw or nut, it can lead to problems with future re-installation. It’s important to use a washer that’s hard enough for the given screw. For instance, be sure to use a hardened washer for high-strength screws and bolts (Grade 8 and socket head cap screws).
Locking Devices: There are several different types that ostensibly help to keep a joint from loosening. Their effectiveness depends on the application and is somewhat debateable.
- Split lock washer: These have two features that supposedly prevent loosening: a spring action and an edge that digs into the screw on reversal. According to this threadit seems that everyone from NASA to British defense to the US navy thinks split lock washers are useless. Some of the rationale include the fact that the spring force of the washer is only around 5% of the force from the stretched bolt, and that the edge cannot dig into anything when it flattens out. Yet, millions of these washers are used every year, so one would think they’re not completely useless.According to the “Handbook of Bolts and Bolted Joints,” by Bickford, p. 243, the lock washer undergoes additional deformation after it flattens with a spring rate more comparable to that of the bolt. This extra springyness is helpful for preventing fatigue failure, but it’s unlikely that it helps prevent loosening.These washers are probably most effective in joints where the recommended tightness cannot be achieved, such as soft metal, plastic or wood joints. In these cases, the washer would likely not be entirely flat and would indeed dig into the screw surfaces.
- Toothed washers: These have small teeth that dig into adjacent screw and joint material. The consensus seems to be that these are more effective than split lock washers, but will (and must) cause damage to adjacent surfaces, which may affect repeated installation.
- Belleville washers: These are cone shaped (not shown) washers are used more as a precision spring than a locking device. They can be stacked to increase their combined spring rate (see the wiki). Their spring rates are substantially higher than split lock washers. They may provide some protention in high vibration or temperature changes. Wavy washers have a similar purpose.
- Sems: These are screws with freely spinning captured washers–washers that are permanently attached. See some pictures here.
- Fender washers: These have a much wider outer diameter than typical washers and are useful on softer materials.
- Loctite: This is actually the prefered method for securing screws against vibration. Loctite is like a glue that hardens when oxygen is removed. The most common type can be removed by heating the joint.
- Castle Nuts: These have slots that accept a cotter pin that goes through a drilled hole in the bolt.
- Lock Wires: Bolts heads with holes are strung together with wire so that they cannot turn relative to each other. Used for vibration resistance and as an anti-tampering device.
- Lock Nuts: The most common type is a nut with a nylon insert. These are very effective (certainly more so than lock-washers), but may not work for reassembly. There are also nuts called “prevailing-torque” locknuts. These have warped threads or tapered features that apply increased friction on the bolt.
Material Selection
There’s a vast amount of different materials, platings and coatings to choose from. This talks about many of these options, we’ll focus on some of the more common ones here. The material selection is influenced by required strength, temperature, resistance to corrorsion, joint materials, and cost.
- Zinc plating: Because of steel’s tendency to rust, you’ll never get bare steel fasteners. The most common covering is zinc, but this won’t stand up to outdoor conditions.
- Black Oxide: Most common on socket head cap screws and other machines screws. This provides very mild protection against corrosion and usually has an oil film added for additional protection.
- Hot-Dipped Galvanized: For outdoor use, this provides the best (common) protection next to stainless steel.
- Stainless Steel and aluminum: These materials are inherently resistant to corrosion because they form a tough oxide layer when exposed to oxygen. Note that the strength of stainless is much less than alloy steel, and even less so for aluminum.
- Galvanic Corrosion: When placed in contact along with an electrolite (like humid air), certain metals form little batteries that corrode each other. It happens when the metals are substantially electrochemically different from each other. For instance, brass and zinc plating wouldn’t be a good choice. More informaion.
Additional Resources and References
- “Unbrako’s Engineering Guide“
- “ref 1” : “Fundamentals of Machine Component Design,” by Robert C. Juvinall, Kurt M. Marchek
- The Machinery’s Handbook, 27th ed.
- “Handbook of Bolts and Bolted Joints,” by John Herbert Bickford, Sayed Nassar
- “What Every Engineer Should Know About Threaded Fasteners: Materials and Design,” by Alexander Blake
- Here’s a great doc from tessco that talks about different screw types and their applications, grade and strength information, and screw material guidance.
- A massive guide about material selection with links at the bottom to just about everything else you’d want to know about screws, including dimensions, installation torques, heat treatment, thread creation, etc.
- An interesting article claiming that some bolts are not meant to be tightened to proof load:
- A substatial glossary of bolt terms.
Wiping the iron on an edge of a hole cut into a sponge can help to remove oxides easier, and also allows waste to fall away. A dry cleaner can also be used. It consists of soft metal shavings that are coated with flux. You clean by thrusting the iron into the shaving a few times. By avoiding the thermal shock of touching a damp sponge, these cleaners help to increase tip life, and in our opinion, do a better, faster job.
Expand to see how .032″ and .015″ solder compare to a SOIC surface mount chip and fine pitch (.02″) device.
Lead boils at over 3000 °F, and in most cases soldering tips should be kept below 750 °F, so it is highly unlikely that gaseous lead is present in the fumes. The fumes are actually from the flux boiling, which still isn’t great for you–many of the chemicals found in cigarette smoke are found in flux fumes: formaldehyde, toluene, alcohols, and hydrochloric acid to name a few. Most of the public health literature indicates that asthma is the major health risk from soldering fumes (not cancer or lead poisoning). When acquired, it is permanent and can cause hyper sensitivity so that even small amounts of fumes bring on attacks. Surprisingly, scientists have not been able to determine what exactly in the fumes cause the health defects, nor what amounts are harmful. Yet, the British health department has set exposure limits of .05 mg/m^3 over 8 hours and .15 mg/m^3 over 15 minutes. I believe these limits have been shown to provide a safe work environment and also one for which the necessary systems / filters are financially reasonable.
Comments:
Feedback and corrections are greatly appreciated.
A very useful page, thankyou.
This is a very well written article and I have some information I thought might be helpful. The SAE grade marking for number one is the same as for number two. If you use stainless hardware (bolts, nuts, washers) they will not rust for an extremely long time, even in a salt water environment, unless if they are in contact with carbon steel. Then they will rust. If you have to do any cutting or filing of stainless hardware, clean it with a non ferrous wire wheel or brush after the work is done. There can be enough metal transfer from a file to your stainless piece to cause rust to star. Galvanized hardware is a good alternative to stainless but be aware that the process of making something galvanized requires that it is dipped in a molten metal vat (hot dipping). The coating can increase the size the item in thousandth. Also the galvanized coating on a bolt can make the threads thicker causing binding and seizing of the nut. I have snapped many bolts because of galvanizing. I you need a item to be corrosion resistant and you do not want to buy stainless or galvanized components you can use buy a product called Cold-Galvo or Cold Galvanizing spray. It has many of the same proprieties as hot dipped hardware. Though not as effective as hot dipped, it is easy to apply and dries fast. One note of caution about Cold-Galvo and other such sprays; lots of them contain highly dangerous materials such as lead, be very careful when using them and have the necessary respiratory protection. My thoughts about lock washer; they are fine for use in low to no vibration applications. I have worked on many of an engine and found many high grade lock washers snapped in half. Three things; if you are going to use a lock washer but do not want the material to be damaged put a flat washer between the lock washer and the material being secured. Second, if you want an alternative to the lock washer try using lock tight. It is anaerobic drying glue. It will only dry between the threads of the nut and bolt and it is very strong. Lastly, if you need to have a locking nut and bolt use a lock nut instead. They cost a little bit more but are well worth it. My preference is a nylon lock nut. It has a nylon insert that locks the bolt. The other kind that I know of is a pinched lock nut (I don’t know if that is the right name for it), I have only seen these in aluminum but it looks like a standard nut that is slightly squished, the aircraft industry used them a lot. A note on lock nuts; once a lock nut is used and then loosened, the locking ability is reduced. On last thought about nuts and bolts; it whatever you are doing will need to be undone at some future point and time consider applying an anti-seize compound to the threads of the bolt. Your local auto parts store has tubes of anti-seize but it is of a low grade and works only so-so, but the tubes only costs from $3 to $5. If you can afford it buy an industrial grade. A bottle of industrial grade anti-seize about the size of a bottle of Tylenol can cost you up words of $45, but a little goes a very, very long way. Anti-seize has a melting temperature of 1400 F to 1800 F so it is great for engine work. Most of the anti-seize compounds I have seen are copper or graphite based. I hope my ranting has helped.
Awesome info Mark! That’s interesting about steel shavings enabling rust to start from filing a SS screw.
I’ve heard that an easy way to loosen loctite is to hit the bolt with a flame for a minute. I think they sell high-temp loctite, too, though.
One other “locking nut” I’ve read about is one where the threads are slightly off-pitch, or maybe just the last thread… you end up with definite yielding. If things are tightened correctly, though, this happens a little bit in the last couple threads of a normal nut anyway.